|
|
|
January 2010
Other recent issues: | Jay Graydon: SongwriterAmerican West Coast musicPublished in PM August 2009 People + Opinion : Artists / Engineers / Producers / Programmers Grammy Award-winning songwriter, producer, recording artist and engineer Jay Graydon is one of the founding fathers of American West Coast music, with many of his numerous recordings over the years appearing on record, film, TV and stage.
Jay Graydon is a man of many talents, and many credits. Allmusic.com lists around 500 of the latter, ranging from producer, arranger, engineer, programmer, guitarist and keyboardist to vocalist and songwriter. Graydons commercial heydays were in the 70s and 80s, when a breathtaking flurry of creative activity resulted in his signature languid guitar lines being featured on hundreds of records (most famously on Steely Dans Aja (1977), a platform from which he went on to write songs with, and produce the likes of, Al Jarreau, Earth, Wind & Fire, George Benson, the Manhattan Transfer, Herbie Hancock, DeBarge, Kenny Rogers and many others, as well as contributing to a large number of film scores. During this period, Graydon amassed an impressive 12 Grammy nominations, two of which he won, both in the category of Best R&B Song: in 1979 for After The Love Has Gone and in 1982 for Turn Your Love Around. In the 90s, Graydon began toning down his activities. To some degree, he went into semi-retirement — the royalty cheques of the 200-plus songs hed (co-)written, many of them classics, obviously came in very handy — but he also focused more on developing a career as an artist in his own right, first with a band called Planet 3 with renowned songwriter and keyboardist Glen Ballard, then working together with the legendary keyboardist, songwriter and producer David Foster in Airplay. Graydon released his first genuine solo album, Holdin On To Love, in 1994. In 2001 he set up his own record label, Sonic Thrust, and in that same year he released an album called Bebop, which, as the title suggests, contained a collection of instrumental jazz tunes. Bebop was clearly not designed to set the charts alight, and during the last 15 years Graydon has apparently been quite content to keep a relatively low profile. A significant part of his time went into sharing his experience and encyclopaedic knowledge of guitar playing and the music-making process in a number of articles, books and tutorials. Recent venture After The Love Has Gone (Graydon/Foster/Champlin) was a huge hit for Earth, Wind & Fire in 1979. Photos: Chris Walter/Retna In late 2008, rather unexpectedly, Graydon returned with another stab at the limelight with the band JaR, a collaboration with fellow songwriting legend, keyboardist and Nashville resident Randy Goodrum, known for classic songs like Anne Murrays You Needed Me and Totos Ill Be Over You — Goodrum was inducted into the Nashville Songwriters Hall Of Fame in 2000. JaRs excellent first album, Scene 29, stands firmly in the tradition of Steely Dan, with 11 pop songs full of unusual lyrical twists, nifty arrangements and jazzy chord changes. Barring an additional vocal in one track and a brief orchestration in another, the album is entirely a duo affair, with Goodrum and Graydon jointly responsible for the songwriting, vocals, arrangements, instrumentation, engineering, mixing, production and mastering. The only genuine solo elements are Graydons rip-roaring guitar solos. Highly acclaimed by those in the know, Scene 29 remained below the radar of the mainstream music press. Undeterred and despite the fact that Scene 29 took two years to record, Graydon and Goodrum are currently in the studio recording a follow-up. While in the middle of this the Los Angeles guitarist and songwriter took some time off to share details of his approach to songwriting, then and now. “Randy and I have no rules with the writing of the JaR material,” explains Graydon. “We take chances wherever possible, using unexpected chord changes, while keeping the melodies memorable. Its not an easy task, but well worth the work. I cant really give you details of what we did on the first album, since I intentionally didnt commit the stuff to memory because I dont want to get hung up on repeating myself with the next JaR album. Weve written about 10 songs for the new album and have started recording. I humbly say that the stuff is good. We plan to do more writing so we have a bunch of songs to choose from for the final version.” Dummy lyrics
The amount of hit songs that Jay Graydon has written during his long career is certainly impressive. After The Love Has Gone (Graydon/Foster/Champlin) was a huge hit for Earth, Wind & Fire, and Turn Your Love Around (Graydon/Lukather/Champlin) did the same for George Benson. Friends In Love (Graydon/Foster/Champlin) was steered to the top of the charts by Dionne Warwick, while Mornin (Graydon/Foster/Jarreau) and Breaking Away (Graydon/Jarreau/Canning) were among several hits Graydon co-wrote for Al Jarreau. Finally, Twilight Zone/Twilight Tone (Graydon/Paul) was a hit for the Manhattan Transfer, and Whos Holding Donna Now (Graydon/Foster/Goodrum) was popularised by DeBarge. And thats to name but a few. When asked how he (co-)writes songs, Graydon stresses that hes “not a lyricist. I have tried to write lyrics in the past and they sucked. Im a melody/chord changes writer first and foremost, but I do occasionally come up with a title concept and a few lyrics, usually when Im just singing dummy lyrics. I start a song just by messing around with a keyboard sound such as a piano, Rhodes or a B4 organ patch, playing chord changes. I may have a groove in mind or simply just go with what my brain comes up with at that moment. After I have the chord progression for a verse or a chorus, I come up with a melody. Sometimes I have the melody first, and in that case I try to imagine the basic chords in my head. Ill then go to the keyboard, using a piano or other sound, and work out whatever chords I had thought of. “Its very important for me to keep a cassette or little digital recorder running when Im working on stuff so I wont forget ideas as they fly by. For example, when I was writing the song Call Donovan [on JaRs Scene 29] and came to the section that introduced a bunch of chords passing quickly, I was just winging it and kept going with the idea, even as I knew that I might not use some of those chords in the long run. I was working on the fly and did not remember the sequence in full, and I later referred to the recording to learn what I played. I then modified the sequence to taste. “I make a clear distinction between the phase when ideas arrive on the fly and a later stage when I edit. Once the basic idea is in shape, I experiment and play around with the melody and the chord changes to refine and modify the idea. The key is to be careful not to refine too much so it doesnt get unnecessarily complicated. My experience is that singing dummy words with the melody is always better than singing la la la words, because dummy lyrics (even though they may not make sense) show up syllable sounds that work well for the melody. “Sometimes some of the dummy lyrics end up in the song. On the next JaR album, one song is loaded with the dummy lyrics I banged out, and the hook of the song Your Heartbreak on Scene 29 came from my dummy lyrics. I had come up with the chorus idea before Randy and I got together, and played and sang it to him with a dummy lyric that went, Nothing but a heartache. The word stuck with Randy, and he turned it into heartbreak and wrote the rest of the lyrics around that concept. I also remember that when producing Dionne Warwicks Friends In Love album [1982], we asked Stevie Wonder to write two songs. He had not finished the lyric to one of them and sang dummy lyrics. The lyrics made no sense, but since he is such a great singer they sounded totally believable!” Frustrated jazzer
Graydon quotes Stevie Wonder as his favourite writer and singer of all time. Other heroes/influences include David Foster (“The best pop songwriter for the last 30 years — a total genius!”), Bill Cantos, Randy Goodrum, and Donald Fagen and Walter Becker (“Unbelievable!”). Throughout his career, jazz has clearly been a strong influence on Graydon, as is evident in the jazzy chord changes that are the hallmark of much of his music, particularly in his work with Al Jarreau, JaR and, naturally, on his Bebop album. According to Graydon, the jazz chords arrive both during the intuitive, stream-of-consciousness stage and the later editing stage of writing. “Chords and voicings may get more sophisticated during the editing stage,” explains Graydon. “Typically, thats the time when I really think a lot about voicings leading from one chord to another. Deep down, I am a frustrated jazz guitarist. I knew I would never play like Joe Pass or the like, so I made the decision to make a living as a studio guitarist. But the frustrated jazzer in me always pops up when it can. In any case, the language of harmony comes naturally to me. I learned in high school that complex chord shapes are based on simple maths, based on chord extensions. For example, a Cm7 chord has the major seventh degree of the C scale. During the editing stage Ill think of turnarounds and II-V-I endings.” (See Harmonic theory and back-cycling box, above). Graydon relates that his approach to writing has not changed over the years, though the tools of his trade have evolved. “In the old days, I wrote playing the guitar more often. And in this era, I use Pro Tools for all recording, whether a demo or master. I have an HD3 system in the studio and an LE system at the beach house. The LE system is just for writing and demos. If Im writing to pitch a song, I use the HD3 system, as it has all of my plug-ins. If Im writing for a JaR song that Randy also will work on, it could be on either Pro Tools system. The keyboard patches are in both Pro Tools systems. My demos are extremely basic as to the sounds. Typically, Ill use ToonTrack Superior Drummer for the drums and I just program a simple loop. Sometimes therell be no drums and just a click track. Ill play the piano part and a bass part, using the Jaco bass patch in Trilogy, and Ill record a melody guide vocal.” An earlier age
Given that hes not a lyricist, writing songs with others is an important and unwavering ingredient in the Jay Graydon songwriting method. He states that the “only variable” in the way he writes is in “writing in different styles for different artists. When composing for a specific artist, I focus on their vocal style and vocal range when working on the melody, as well as on the kind of feel, whether its a straight eighth-note groove or a sixteenth-note groove, or a triple groove or a ballad, whatever. Its always important to respect the market in which the artist sells. When writing for myself, or JaR, there are no musical rules. I just go for total freedom and I dont get hung up about another artist performing the song. “With regards to writing with others, when you work with a good songwriter, the idea pool is doubled! You can feed off each others ideas. When writing by myself, its also easier to get stuck in recycling past ideas. I also move more slowly. When working with co-writers, a song typically takes no more than two nights to complete. When Im alone, I can write a melody and a chord change any time I want. Writers block, for me, is getting hung up on past melodies and chord patterns. Years ago, I would get p*ssed off at myself for not being able to be totally creative each time I start a song, until I figured out that such thoughts caused stupid stress, and that the bottom line is to simply write when I feel like doing it and hope for the best. I still get excited when I come up with fresh melodies and chord changes. “In the case of JaR, Randy and I wrote the songs in one or two fashions: either together in the studio (around two thirds of the CD) or via email, sending each other song starts. For instance, in the case of Call Donovan I sent Randy the start, and he modified that and sent that to me. I then did some changes to that and sent it back to him, and so on. If either of us does not like a melody line or chord passage, we look for alternatives. In the long run, we eventually iron out the music to the point where we both agree, and Randy then writes the lyrics. As to the lyrics, Randy is a genius! As mentioned, sometimes I come up with a concept such as the song Scene 29. I love film noir stuff from the 1940s and gave Randy some films to watch, as well as noting some phrases from a few films. As always, Randy nailed a great lyric that worked perfectly for the concept! “By contrast, the song Cure Kit came about in a very different way. I had just purchased a Yamaha Motif 73 keyboard because it has a good Rhodes patch. My good friend Tim Hosman and I were hanging out in my studio and Tim started messing with patches in the Motif. He found an acoustic guitar performance patch that has a built-in rhythm when you hold down notes on the keyboard. Tim held down notes in the Dm chord, changed to a Dm(maj7) chord and then followed with a Dm7 to Dm6. Its a very common chord pattern, but I dug the way the patch worked with the chords. Later that night, I adjusted the tempo of the patch and found a good tempo for the groove, and matched the tempo to Pro Tools. I added more chords until I thought I had a good chord structure for the verse. I then recorded the part and overdubbed a rough vocal melody. Randy modified the verse melody and wrote a chorus. The song was completed within a few days with Randy and I sending each other MIDI files and MP3s. Tim didnt write any of the song, but because his chord change idea was the reason the song was written, we gave him a share in the song. “With regards to recording the songs, Randy programmed piano, bass and drums — I consider myself a good programmer/arranger, but Randy is better than I. He then sent me MIDI files (we have the same sample/synth programs to work with). I tweak the MIDI velocities and maybe change some part. After Randy and I agree all is cool, I record the stuff in Pro Tools HD3. We both do overdubs on our own (vocals, guitars, and so on) and send each other WAV files via an FTP site.” Graydons tools, both in the studio and when writing, are clearly fully up to date. But his methods — again both in the studio and when writing — are still firmly locked in an earlier age. Graydon mixed Scene 29 on his Neve console, with major time spent adjusting outboard gear. Graydon and Goodrum also make a big deal of the fact that they dont join in with the loudness wars and dont put compression over the stereo mix. They suggest that any listener who wants a CD louder can simply turn up the volume. The cheek of it! It has to be said, however, that Scene 29 has a beautiful, silky sound that harks back to the best days of analogue and doesnt tire the ear after repeated listening, unlike many current CDs. Engineering and mixing are clearly close to Graydons heart. Asked whether there are songs hes written that make him cringe when he now hears them, he replies, “Yeah, some do, but I keep in mind that they were part of a learning experience. What makes me really cringe is hearing a mix of mine that doesnt sound very good.” Graydon achieved songwriting and mixing/engineering mastery a long time ago, and so when the second JaR album sees the light of day, some time in 2010, the quality of the songs and sounds is likely to be top-notch. All the listener will have to do is turn up the volume. Chord progressions, harmonic movement and back-cycling The essential principle of harmonic movement can be a bit tricky to grasp because its so counter-intuitive. However, it only takes a simple shift of perspective to make it super-easy, so bear with this explanation. Music moves forwards in time and so musicians will naturally think forward in time when playing melodies, rhythms, solos and chord progressions. If one is at point A in a piece of music, one moves from there to point B and then to point C and so on. However, from a time-based perspective, harmonic cadences (called turnarounds in jazz) are based on reverse logic. The idea is to go straight to an end point of a song section and then look backwards. Essentially, in traditional harmony, when trying to get from point A to point C, one doesnt find point B in between by looking forward from point A, but rather by looking backwards from point C. Cadences, or turnarounds, are constructed in this way and doing this is therefore called back-cycling. For instance, say the beginning of a song is in the key of C. For some reason, you want to end up in the key of Eb-maj at the end of the section youre writing. Rather than think how to get from C to Eb, the idea is to think Eb and then back-cycle from there to C. This involves placing the mother of all cadences in front of Eb — the famous II-V-I progression — in which Eb is the I, also called the tonic. In the scale of Eb (Eb, F, G, Ab, Bb, C, D), the II chord is Fm7 (its also called the subdominant and can be interchanged with the other subdominant, on the fourth step, which in Eb is Ab). The V in the key of Eb, also called the dominant, is Bb7. So the II-V-I progression in Eb is Fm7-Bb7-Eb. However, none of these chords occur in the key of C, so one may want to back-cycle even further to a bridge chord that works in both C and Eb. This can be done by thinking of either the subdominant (in this case Fm7) or the dominant (Bb7) as a temporary tonic and placing a dominant (V) in front of that. In turn, one may, if one likes, place a II before that new dominant (remember, the basic sequence is always II-V-I). In this case, if one defines Bb as a temporary tonic, its dominant is F7, and the second chord or II in the key of Bb is Cm7. This still does not yet lead us to C-maj, but by regarding Cm as a new tonic and sticking a dominant on that, one does arrive at a shared chord, for the dominant of Cm7 is G7, which is also the dominant of C-maj. G7 can therefore function as a bridge chord. So the whole back-cycled progression would go: C (the initial key)-G7-Cm7-F7-Bb7-Eb. When playing this, one can immediately hear the characteristic (some would say clichéd) bass movement in fourths. It is important to note that the post-modern view of music harmony holds that there are no rules, so anything is possible and allowable and the only true judge is your own good, or bad, taste. However, these harmonic cadences are deeply locked in our collective subconscious, and using them will help make a song or a piece of music sound more palatable. This can be very helpful when trying to write a hit song, or to provide some degree of recognition for a piece of music that is, on other levels — lyrically, sonically, rhythmically, harmonically — rather left-field. For example, write a piece consisting only of atonal, heavily distorted guitar notes and put a cadence under it, and it immediately will be more palatable to a larger audience. It may also benefit aesthetically from the mixture of the experimental and the traditional. With regards to the problem that II-V-I progressions can easily sound totally and utterly clichéd, skilled composers and songwriters have all sorts of tricks to disguise II-V-I and find variations of it. Sometimes they only hint at it. Jay Graydon expands, “It is always an ongoing process to find new ways to get to a new tonal centre without using a stock II-V-I progression. One trick is to make sure that the chord before the next chord has a common tone. For example, in the song After The Love Has Gone the last chord of the verse is B-maj7. The first chord of the chorus is Cm7. The common note is Eb. David Foster came up with that and it is total genius! I have learned over the years that when I need a four-chord turnaround, back-cycling is in play, so I look at the tonal centre I am going to. The dominant chord could also be the flat II chord, or any chord with a common tone that makes some kind of leading sense. Then the question is what the next chord is to back-cycle to, which would lead into the dominant chord. If I had to compose a four-chord transition at this moment, my first stock choice would be F#-maj7 to D#m7 (a very pleasing VI chord) to Bm7 — the common tone is Fb — to D triad over E bass (many common tones). After more thought, the turnaround might be F#-maj7 to E triad over F# bass to Bm7 (the common tone is B) to D triad over E (again, many common tones).” Some more examples of the use of the II-V-I progression in similar genre hit songs can be found in an interview in Sound On Sound with Americas top songwriter Diane Warren: www.soundonsound.com/sos/aug08/articles/warren.htm. Inspiration and perspiration: two classic songs Jay Graydon shares his memories of writing two classic songs. After The Love Has Gone (Graydon, Foster, Champlin) “David Foster had produced an album for Jaye P Morgan, and he and the investor had a meeting at Motown to pitch the album. Foster started playing a song on piano and got lost. Since he is such a genius, he improvised a chorus. Not sure what happened next in the meeting, but when David left he drove to my house freaking out because he had come up with such a great melody! We went into my studio and David played the chord changes and melody, and I was knocked out! “I picked up a guitar and played A(add 2) to Dm6 and then back to A(add 2) and sang the melody that starts the verse. David then played C#7#9 to F#m7 and so on, keeping my melody pattern in play. I cant remember how we dealt with the B section, but it happened quickly. The trick was to connect the last chord of the B section (Bmaj7) to the first chord of the chorus (Cm7). So the chorus was already in play, as that was the idea we were starting with. “The next thing to do was to find a turnaround so as to get back to the second verse. In the original version (recorded with Airplay) were going from F#maj7 back to the key of A. I dont remember what chords we used for the turnaround. Note that the verse in the Earth, Wind & Fire version was in F, which meant that there was another turnaround.” Turn Your Love Around (Champlin, Graydon, Lukather) “Tommy Lipuma at Warner Bros had hired me to produce two songs for Bensons collection album [1981]. I had four days to come up with a great song that could be used as a single. I went to work, but after two days I still had not come up with anything I liked. Then, while in the bathroom sitting on the toilet, I came up with a melody for the chorus! I kept singing it over and over, and as soon as I could I went into the studio to record it. I also had the chord changes in mind, so I played the chords and sang the melody into the cassette recorder. “The next night, Steve Lukather and I (along with our ladies of the era) were to go to dinner. I asked Luke to come over early to see if he could come up with the verse. I played him the chorus a few times and then let him mess around with ideas as I took a shower. About a half hour later, I went back into the studio and Luke had nailed a great verse! We went to dinner, and after we returned to the studio we called Bill Champlin and asked whether he could come over to work on a bridge and lyrics. Bill showed up and he nailed the bridge! He wrote the lyrics the next day and we demoed the song that night. Benson and the record company dug the song and we recorded the track shortly thereafter. “During recording I had trouble finding a good muted rhythm guitar part for the chorus. I finally found a part that worked, and five minutes after I had recorded it arranger Jerry Hey called and said that he had come up with a good horn section line for the chorus. He sang the line, or maybe he played it, over the phone and it was the exact same notes I had thought of for the guitar!” Published in PM August 2009
|
|
All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 2007-2010.
All rights reserved. The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither SOS Publications Group nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the Publishers.
Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates | SOS | Relative Media |