Login or Register here
Sub PIN or Email
Password
Remember me
Stay logged in
Lost password?
Request a reminder
Not registered?
Register Now for FREE
No https access?
Login here
Photos too small? Click on photos, screenshots and diagrams in articles to open a Larger View gallery.
January 2010
On sale now at main newsagents and bookstores (or buy direct from the PM Shop)
Latest Print magazine: click here for Performing Musician contents list

 Issue Selector

Electro-Voice N/D767a & N/D967

Dynamic microphones

Published in PM November 2009
Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version

Reviews : Microphone
Both of these mics from EV’s N/DYM series are designed for hand-held live vocal use, but are somewhat different in character.
Mike Crofts
Caption
Caption
The N/D767a and N/D967 are dynamic supercardioid microphones that make use of neodymium technology within the magnetic assembly, which results in an efficient and lightweight design. I took the mics along to a series of rehearsals with my 20-piece band, where we were preparing for a concert featuring male and female guest vocalists, to see what everyone thought.
These two mics are part of Electro-Voice’s N/DYM range of seven mics, which between them cover a range of live and recording vocal and instrumental applications. The N/D767a is a traditional-looking mic with a slim body and slightly elongated mesh basket. Its body is finished in matte black (always my favourite for live use, as it doesn’t reflect the stage lighting), and the surface has a slightly rubbery feel that EV call ‘Warm Grip’, which describes it very well. On closer examination and from what I could see without being too destructive, the grip surface appears to be a separate jacket or sleeve fitted over the metal body, which is a neat piece of design, as this mic won’t suffer from the awful flaky, peeling look that happens when thin rubberised coatings start to become worn.
The top half of the strong wire-mesh basket unscrews to reveal the capsule assembly, which is shockmounted but firmly anchored, and there is a thin layer of foam inside to protect from moisture and popping. Where the two parts of the basket mate together there is a thin yellow shock bumper, which provides an amount of cushioning if the mic is laid on a hard surface — a not infrequent occurrence in the hands of inexperienced announcers, especially those who have never purchased any gear of their own!
Near or far?
The top part of the N/D967’s basket contains a two-stage pop shield, which can be removed for cleaning when necessary.
The top part of the N/D967’s basket contains a two-stage pop shield, which can be removed for cleaning when necessary.
The performance figures for the N/D767a are stated for both ‘close’ and ‘far’ applications, and the user guide refers to EV’s Vocally Optimised Bass technology, which is designed to reduce LF distortion and improve clarity. There’s a standard description of proximity effect, which advises the optimum source-to-mic distance for different applications, and the response chart provided illustrates the possible difference in low-frequency output levels. The published response figures extend from 35Hz (close use) up to a more than respectable 22kHz, although what the output level is at the higher frequency limit is difficult to determine from the printed curve (the line isn’t shown all the way up to 22kHz), but I’d be guessing this is at -10dB.
The N/D767a was the first mic we tested at our rehearsal, and it sounded very even and clear at modest volume. When we turned the system up, we were still pleased with the results and especially with its smooth character, particularly on the female vocals. On very loud passages the sound warmed up somewhat (Vicky is a bit of a powerhouse when she gets going, and she’s a good test for any vocal mic), but still cut through well. We were using the mic with no equalisation or effects of any kind — in fact, it was plugged directly into the mic input of an HK LUCAS active system — which I think was a good test, as the singers were encouraged to experiment with different mic distances to see what worked best for them.
More possibilities
Having given the N/D767a a good workout with both singers, we switched to the N/D967, which, although still a dynamic supercardioid, is a bit of a different animal. The N/D967 microphone looks strikingly different, in that it is a ‘flat-top’, reminiscent of those distinctive reporters’ mics you used to see. The body is the same shape and has the same finish as the N/D767a, but the top half of the basket is substantially flat and only about a quarter of an inch deep, giving a stubby appearance, although it’s still attractive. When I unscrewed this section of the basket, I found that the top part contains a foam screen section — quite a bit thicker than the one in the N/D767a — which is a two-stage pop shield and can be removed for cleaning.
The N/D967 is equipped with a small, flush-fitting response switch, which reduces mid-band response slightly and is intended to give more presence when the mic is being used in a very close-up position. The printed response curve again illustrates the proximity effect of close-up use, but with the N/D967 the spec sheet advises that ‘normal’ use is when the singer’s lips are touching the basket (what I’m always trying to persuade performers to do on the live stage).
Our female vocalist, Vicky Amies, was very comfortable with this mic and found that the basket design did work really well close up. In terms of the sound, the clarity and warmth were similar to what we’d heard with the N/D767a, but experimenting with the response switch gave us a few more possibilities — still without any EQ or anything — and in particular we felt that the N/D967 handled louder material better and retained absolute clarity throughout the whole dynamic range. There were one or two occasions when, if we had been using a mixer, I would have been tempted to roll off the top end a little, but what really impressed me was no matter how loud we went — and belting out power ballads over a 20-piece band in a fairly lively space needs to be more than a bit loud, believe me — the vocal sound remained focused and clean, and the N/D967 gave the impression that it was never going to run out of headroom no matter what we did. This is an excellent mic for getting the vocals across in a big way, and everyone in the room agreed that the sound had that exciting presence and character needed for the big show.
With our male vocalist, Jason Oakes, we were rehearsing smooth, swing-y numbers, and both mics sounded very nice indeed. I didn’t find much to choose between them, although Jason slightly preferred the physical balance of the shorter N/D967, and I tended to favour the fatter bottom-end sound of the N/D767a. The smooth and pleasing character of the vocal came across with plenty of body, and Jason’s big build-up at the end of ‘Mack The Knife’ remained clear and consistent in sound balance and quality. Using the two singers was interesting because Jason tends to sing more cabaret-style, holding the mic a few inches away (hence the fatter low end from the N/D767a, I guess), whereas Vicky left her mic on the stand and stood right up to it, which is exactly what the N/D967 is built for.
Instrumentally speaking
Back home in my music room, I tried both mics on instruments, and despite being designed for live vocal use, both sounded pretty good on acoustic guitar, although the placement was a bit more fussy with the N/D767a and some experimenting would be necessary to get the best out of it. I also tried the N/D767a in front of a guitar cab (fine, no issues for a live gig) and the N/D967 on close-miked brass (trumpet and trombone).
I’d definitely be happy to use a handful of these on a live horn section. The sound was what I call ‘centred’ and very crisp, with no noticeable softening or blurring on louder notes. And I’m sure this would cut through really well on stage, with the tight supercardioid pickup pattern helping to maintain decent separation between individual instruments, even when standing quite close to each other.
Real sparkle
The N/D767a and N/D967 are both, without a doubt, what I’d call very good live microphones. I haven’t used any of the others in the N/DYM range, but lined up against the dynamic vocal mics I normally use, they compare very well and I’d have no hesitation in taking them along to any job. The N/D967 in particular has a real sparkle about it and is capable of producing that big concert sound, which is exactly what I need for tomorrow night’s theatre gig with my 20-piece band and guest vocalists. So guess which mic will be centre stage?  0

Published in PM November 2009
Electro-Voice N/D767a £128 N/D967 £172
These mics have a quality look, feel and finish (not to mention their pedigree), and they sound great on live vocals. And just as importantly, perhaps, the singers liked using them right out of the box.
information
Shuttlesound
+44 (0)208 646 7114
Tech Spec
N/D767a
Dynamic, supercardioid microphone.
Impedance: 300Ω.
Frequency response: 35Hz - 22kHz near-field, 70Hz - 22kHz far-field.
Three-pin XLR connector.
Dimensions (WH): 52 x 181mm.
Weight: 260g.
Tech Spec
N/D967
Dynamic, supercardioid microphone.
Impedance: 150Ω.
Frequency response: 50Hz - 13kHz near-field, 120Hz - 13kHz far-field.
Three-pin XLR connector.
Dimensions (WH): 52 x 173mm.
Weight: 205g.